Posts in July 2009

Snus

Posted by Kari

Forskere friskmelder snusen.  Researchers report that snus is healthy.  The word friskmelder does not have an exact translation in English, but I suppose I wouldn’t say researchers think snus is ‘healthy’, but rather not unhealthy, not dangerous.  For those of you who don’t know what snus is, it is a smokeless form of tobacco, also known as chew, chaw, or a dip. Snus (pronounced ’snoose’ and actually a word that Americans and others outside of Scandinavia use) has a two unique characteristics 1-it usually does not require spitting and 2-it is steam-cured rather than fire-cured and is not fermented and thus there is no added sugar.  Snus is a moist powder form of tobacco that is placed usually in the upper lip (hence one of the reasons that it doesn’t require spitting, because there is less moisture from saliva up there) for up to 30 minutes and then discarded.  It comes in loose form (fun to say, loose snus, which is packed into a cylindar or sphere called a pris or prilla-slang for pris) or in portioned pouches (which are made of the same material as teabags) and come in a tin similar to Skoal or Copehagen.  Snus is very popular in Scandinavia, particularly Sweden and Norway.

As with many health-related issues, there is debate among researchers over whether snus is better for one’s health than smoking cigarettes, and even if snus is damaging to health at all.  An article in Aftenposten online yesterday addressed a recent study by British researchers, who concluded that snus is not unhealthy.  Most people (including researchers) will definitely agree that using snus is much less harmfull than smoking cigarettes (å røyke sigaretter is ‘to smoke cigarettes) because snus does not involve inhalation, and thus does not affect the lungs.

I was introduced to snus during my time abroad by my friend Jeff who used it.  I decided to try it one time and after that I used it on an occasional basis with him.  I don’t want to encourage starting to use snus or anything, but certainly for those of you who smoke, perhaps it would be a better alternative. 

As cigarette sales dip in the U.S. due to steep price increases for cigarettes and bans on smoking in public places, tobacco companies have started to really advertise and promote snus.  Camel has several versions of the pouches. 

A large portion of the Swedish and Norwegian population use snus, both men and women.  Leave it to them to find a healthier alternative to cigarettes.  Once again, evidence of a healthier population than the U.S. and much of the rest of the world. 

 

Transportmidler

Posted by Kari

Modes of transportation.  Definitely something you want to know how to talk about when you are preparing to travel to another country.  In Norway, you’ll want to know about biler (cars), busser (busses), tog (trains), trikken (the trolley), tbanen (the subway), ferger (ferries), og mer (and more).   You will want to know how to get to the nearest bus stop, what time the train leaves, when the ferry arrives, how much it costs to take a taxi, etc. 

Fortunately, Norway has a stellar public transportation system (which I have described in an earlier post).  I remember the first time I was in Norway, my father and I took a train from Oslo to Bergen, then took the Hurtigrute (the big cruise ship-also described in an earlier post) up to Ålesund, where we were on a mission to find long lost relatives.  We took a bus to get to our hotel, from where the lady working at the hotel (which actually had a grass roof that goats would enjoy “mowing”) offered to drive us to our relatives’ farm (because she knew them, and everyone else in the area).  So, we got exactly where we wanted to go using a handful transportmidler.  Needless to say, it was pretty cool.

And now, some phrases that you will for sure want to learn (and keep in mind I have not translated them all literally, but rather they way you would really say them):

Hvor lang tid tar det å kjøre fra Oslo til Lillehammer (and of course replace the place names with whichever ones you are dealing with)?  — How long does it take to drive from Oslo to Lillehammer?

Hvilken tbanestasjon skal jeg stige av?  Which tbane-station should I get off at?

Hvor mye koster det å ta en drosje til Oslo sentralstasjonen?  How much does it cost to take a taxi to Oslo central station?

I hvilken retning kjører denne bussen?  Which direction does this bus go?

Når drar fergen?  When does the ferry leave?

Hvilken rute skal jeg ta?  Which route should I take?

Er det fortere å kjøre bil eller ta bussen?  Is it faster to drive a car or take the bus?

Hvor sent om natten kjører drosjen?  How late in the night does the taxi go?

Hvor mye koster billetten?  How much does a ticket cost?

Har du et tbanekort?  Do you have a tbane card?

Hvilken stasjonen skal jeg stige på?  Which station should I get on?

Er det mye plass på toget?  Is there a lot of room on the train?

Tar denne fergen biler over fjorden?  Does this ferry take cars across the fjord?

Stopper tbanen på Nasjonalteateret?  Does the tbane stop at the National Theater?

These are just a few phrases that you may want to get comfortable with before you travel to Norway.  You can get what you want in English the majority of the time, but it’s more fun to practice your norsk!

 

1000. henrettelse

Posted by Kari

1000th execution.  In the U.S. that is since it became legal å henrette (to execute) prisoners in 1977.  Wow.  That is 1000 in 32 years.  Seems like a lot to me.  I still don’t know what I think is the best method for punishing serial killers and rapists.  Who am I to know if they can be rehabilitated and one day give back to society.  Perhaps those thousand people didn’t deserve to live after what they had done.  I cannot venture to say.  I do know two things though:  the number of U.S. citizens who support dødsstraffen (death penalty) has gone significantly down (from about 80% to 60% in the last 20 years and the United States is “det eneste “såkalte” vestlige landet” (”the only “so-called western country-according to the article in Aftenposten online the other day) that practices dødsstraffen.  While it is true that 60% of the world’s population live in countries that practice the death penalty, isn’t it strange that dødsstraffen, something most people would agree is quite barbaric, is practiced by the United States, the superpower of the world?  Seems backwards. 

To be clear, 15 states in the U.S. and the District of Columbia now ban the dødsstraffen.  This brings me to abolitionism.  Most people today are abolitionists in terms of the dødsstraffen, meaning that they do not support it and wish to avskaffe (abolish) the death penalty.  Let’s go through a list of some countries and when they abolished dødsstraffen.  It was Grand Duke Leopold II who was the first in modern times to ban dødsstraffen in the (then) independent Grand Duchy of Tuscany (in the late 18th century).  The Roman Republic banned it in 1849, followed by Venezuela in 1863.  In Portugal, 1867.  In the United Kingdom, 1969 (the last took place in 1964).  France in 1981, Canada 1976, Australia 1985.  Togo, Africa,is the most recent country to have avskaffet (abolished) dødsstraffen on June 23 of this year.  What about Norge

In Norway, 300 people were burned in the 16th and 17th centuries during the witch hunts.  In 1815, the cruelest forms of dødsstraffen were avskaffet.  In 1876 the last execution during peacetime was committed.  In Norway the last execution in peacetime was carried out in 1876.  During World War II, Vidkun Quisling’s regime brought dødsstraffen back into the picture.  In 1988, Norway signed protocol 6 of the European Convention for Human Rights banning the death penatly in peacetime.  Norway opposes dødsstraffen at home and outside of the country.  In fact, Norway will not send Mullah Krekar (a Kurd from northern Iraq who was the original leader of an armed Islamic group) back to his homecountry, Iraq, because of the potential of being charged with crimes punished by capital punishment there. 

Norway is avidly against the practice of dødsstraffen because it violates the sanctity of human life. 

 

 

Little grills

Posted by Kari

There is an article in Aftenposten online today titled “Engansgrillens dødare” (The engangsgrills killers)- about a group of 5 Norwegian firemen and 1 Norwegian firewoman (brannfolk-brann meaning fire) who are testing small, portable, multiple use grills that will hopefully discontinue the use of engangsgrills-the small disposable grills that you can purchase at a grocery store or convenience store in Norway to grill a few pølser on and dump it in the søppelkassen (garbage can).  Engangsgriller work ok (except they can easily burn the food you are grilling because there is not much space between the coals and the grate that the food sits on), but they are obviously not the most environmentally friendly (miljøvennlig) contraptions as they get tossed i søppelkassen after one use.  Who better to test grills than brannfolk?

Brannfolket tested 5 grills.  And here is what they had to say about them:

(refer to the following website for bilder (pictures) and mer informasjon (more information):

http://oslopuls.aftenposten.no/aktivitet_friluft/article235686.ece

The characteristics that each grill was judged for include pris (price), størrelse av gassbeholderen (the size of the gas tank), plass på grillen (space on the grill), vekt (weight), letthet å bære (ease to carry), hvor raskt den blir varm eller kald (how fast it becomes hot or cold), and avstand fra kull (distance from the coals). 

The conclusions suggested the following: 

-the best grill would be lett å bære and not too heavy, yet not built so cheaply that it will ‘be destroyed easily’ (bli lett ødelagt)

-the design would allow it to provide ample grill surface area for grilling several things at once

-far enough distance from the coals to the grate sånn at maten ikke brenner (so the food does not burn), but close enough so it does not take forever for the food to get hot

-built so that the grill heats up quickly and also cools down quickly for storage and transport

-also brannfolket seemed to really like the grills built with little legs to protect the under side from damage

Check out the website.  It’s a pretty interesting and light-hearted article. The picture of the brannfolk with those teeny tiny grills is entertaining.  I do support that they are trying to encourage consumers to buy these relatively inexpensive, multi-use, easily portable grills.  When you consider all the people who buy the engangsgriller and how much waste they create, spending a little extra money on one of these grills will be worth it in the end for the consumer and for the planet.

 

Hva er klokka?

Posted by Kari

What time is it?

Klokka er….

It is…

I can’t believe I haven’t written a post on TIME (tid) yet!

The way Norwegians express time is much different than the way Americans do.  We simply say for example “It is five thirty” meaning it is thirty minutes past 5 o’clock.  Or “it is quarter to seven” meaning it is six forty-five.  And unless you are in the military, you would write 5:30 and 6:45 respectively.  In Norway to say 5:30 requires a little more thought.� It involves the number 6, surprisingly.  5:30 is actually thought of as half the way to 6 from 5, so på norsk it is “halv seks” (half six) and it is written 05.30 (if it’s am that is…).  If it is 5:30 pm, you would write 17.30.  Basically, Norwegian always use the military method of telling time when the time is written. 

Let’s practice another half hour time.  Let’s say 11:30.  På norsk 11:30 would be said “halv tolv” (half twelve) and written 11.30 if am and 23.30 if pm.  12:30 is said, and pay attention here, “halv ett” (not halv en as you might expect.  When it concerns time, one is always ett) and written 00.30 if am and 12.30 if pm.  As you can see, instead of using a colon to separate hours (timer) and minutes (minutter), you just use a period.  Also, as a general rule if there is only a single digit or zero digits for the hour (starting with 12:30 am and continuting to 9:30 pm), you still use 4 spaces.  00.00 is the format and fill in the numbers as needed.

Now let’s move on to quarter to and quarter past.  Quarter two på norsk is kvart på (kvart meaning “quarter”) and kvart over for quarter past.  2:45 would then be said kvart på tre (written 02.45 if am and 14.45 if pm) and 3:15 would be said kvart etter tre (written either 03.15 if am and 15.15 if pm).

If the time falls directly on an hour, that is, with no minutes, one simply says klokka er fem (it is 5 o’clock) or klokka er ti (it is 10 o’clock).

So what about the in between times-those that don’t fall on either quarter, half, or directly on the hour?  Think of the clock in quarters and halves.  If it is 5:10, the time falls in the first quarter of the clock (going clockwise, of course) and thus you refer to the hour.  You say ti over fem (ten after five).  If it is 5:16, the time falls in the second quarter, refer to the half-point and then remember what we do with 30 minutes after the hour.  You would say fjorten på halv seks (fourteen to half six).  I know, it seems weird, but once you get used to it, it’s not so bad.  Just think of the clock in quarters and halves.   Now let’s try the second half of the clock.  How about 7:32?  This time falls in the 3rd quarter of the clock and thus, like the second quarter, you will use the half-way point as your reference.  7:32 would be to over halv åtte (two after half eight).  And, last but not least, 9:54 is in the fourth quarter and thus would reference the full hour.  9:54 would be seks på ti six to ten). 

Clear as mud?